
A parent request may contain a preference, new information about a child's needs, or a concern requiring prompt action. Acknowledge the message without promising a teacher or class. Then route it to the person who can assess it under your school's policy.
State how to submit information, the routine deadline, who reviews it, when families can expect a decision, and how to raise new concerns after that date. Provide an accessible alternative to an online form. Ask about the child's needs rather than inviting rankings of teachers.
Keep a restricted-access request log with receipt date, student identifier, category, reviewer, decision, rationale, response date, and any placement rule entered. Do not circulate a full parent email with general class lists.
Before the placement team meets, move each reviewed item through the same sequence: record the request, classify the information, assign a reviewer, decide whether it changes a rule, then recheck the affected draft. The Shibutz workflow shows where approved preferences, restrictions, and required placements fit. Keep the family message and the internal decision record separate.
| Request | First action and owner | Possible disposition |
|---|---|---|
| A named teacher because a friend recommended them | Coordinator asks what learning or support need underlies the request. | Record the preference; do not promise a teacher. |
| Keep a child with one familiar peer | Current teacher reviews the relationship and conflicting requirements. | Consider as a preference, then review the draft. |
| Keep twins apart | Coordinator consults family and relevant staff about each child. | Record the reviewed together/apart decision; do not infer it from surname. |
| New access or medical information | Responsible support or health lead follows the school process. | Confirm provision and any required placement before approval. |
| A reported safety concern involving another student | Use the school safeguarding or safety process promptly. | Assess protection needs; do not treat the concern as an ordinary friend request. |
These are sample routes, not a substitute for local safeguarding, disability, or education procedures. A routine request deadline should not delay the handling of a new safety or access concern.
Sample acknowledgment; replace the bracketed fields:
Thank you for sharing this information about [child]. We have recorded your request, and [role] will review it alongside the class placement criteria. We cannot confirm a particular teacher or friendship placement at this stage. We expect to respond by [date]. If there is new information about safety, access, or support needs, please contact [school contact] so it can be considered through the appropriate process.
Sample decline for a reviewed routine preference:
We have reviewed your request for [child] under our placement policy. We cannot offer the requested [teacher/friendship] placement. The decision takes account of classroom capacity and the provision required across the year group. We cannot share information about other children's placements. We would welcome a conversation about [child]'s transition needs with [role]. If you have new information relevant to the decision, please use [review process].
Use only reasons that actually informed the decision. Do not claim a class is full if the reason is different, or describe a teacher as unsuitable to justify another assignment. The parent notification letter template provides editable wording for the final placement notice.
Synthetic example: after the routine deadline, a family supplies new information about an access need. The support lead confirms the required provision. The principal approves reopening the draft, rather than granting a teacher preference because the email arrived late. The coordinator checks the proposed room's capacity and any affected students' rules, records the changed version, and seeks signoff before sending a replacement notice.
Record why the exception met the policy, who approved it, and which checks were repeated. If the room cannot accommodate the child, the responsible team must resolve provision and capacity; an exception entry does not create a seat.
Staff can enter friend requests, keep-together preferences, keep-apart restrictions, and required placements. A parent's message does not automatically become a rule. Shibutz does not automatically identify siblings; staff identify the children and enter the reviewed decision.
Keep the request log and sensitive rationale in the school's approved records. Check the generated result against the decisions before approval. The class lists guide explains the wider process; the product walkthrough shows where to enter the inputs. Create a free account when you are ready to build a workspace.

A tool-independent class placement process with a worked 72-student example, unequal room capacities, conflicting friend requests, balance checks, and staff signoff.

Use a printable class placement checklist to freeze the roster, confirm rules and capacity, review the draft, record signoff, and reconcile the final handoff.

Diagnose five class-list failures: hidden needs concentrations, policy bypasses, impossible rules, capacity errors, and approval-version drift. Check each repair.
Tools, product walkthroughs, and guides to put balanced class placement into practice.
Download four editable Word templates for teacher input, staff review, family communication, and final sign-off.
Free toolAnswer a few quick questions to see how ready your school is for balanced, low-stress class placement.
Free toolBuild the weekly schedule around your finished classes without the spreadsheet juggling.